Oumm Qatafa Cave (layer D2)
Basic information
Sample name: Oumm Qatafa Cave (layer D2)
Sample aka: Umm Qatafa
Reference: N. Marom, I. A. Lazagabaster, R. Shafir, F. Natalio, V. Eisenmann, and L. K. Horwitz. 2022. The Late Middle Pleistocene mammalian fauna of Oumm Qatafa Cave, Judean Desert: taxonomy, taphonomy and palaeoenvironment. Journal of Quaternary Science 37(4):612-638 [ER 3989]
Geography
Country: Israel
Coordinate: 31.58° N, 35.36° E
Coordinate basis: based on nearby landmark
Time interval: Middle Pleistocene
Ma: 0.213
Age basis: ESR
Geography comments: "on the western side of Wadi Khareitoun in the Judean hills" (coordinate based on Wadi Khureitun)
"Layer D2 was dated by electron spin resonance (ESR) on herbivore tooth enamel to 213 ± 26 kya"
"Layer D2 was dated by electron spin resonance (ESR) on herbivore tooth enamel to 213 ± 26 kya"
Environment
Lithology: claystone
Taphonomic context: cave,human accumulation
Archaeology: bone tools,stone tools
Habitat comments: layer D2 is "a ~1 m thick layer, characterised by a light brown clay matrix"
there are 10 burnt bones from "Layers D1–D2" and "Human butchery marks were observed only on five bones from Layers D1 and D2"
"evidence for carnivore involvement in the assemblage formation is scarce... Humans are therefore favoured as the major bone‐accumulating agent, at least in Layer D"
Late Acheulian based on "handaxe typology" and "Vaufrey identified five bones that had been used as artefacts and retouched with flint tools" of which two were from D2
there are 10 burnt bones from "Layers D1–D2" and "Human butchery marks were observed only on five bones from Layers D1 and D2"
"evidence for carnivore involvement in the assemblage formation is scarce... Humans are therefore favoured as the major bone‐accumulating agent, at least in Layer D"
Late Acheulian based on "handaxe typology" and "Vaufrey identified five bones that had been used as artefacts and retouched with flint tools" of which two were from D2
Methods
Life forms: carnivores,ungulates,other large mammals,other small mammals
Sampling methods: quarry
Sample size: 58 specimens
Years: 1928, 1932, 1949
Sampling comments: "excavated by Rene Neuville in three seasons – 1928, 1932 and 1949 "
"three hominin phalanges" are mentioned in the text but not described and possibly not "in situ" but "derived from the overlying layer A"
micromammals, reptiles, and birds were described in older literature
some of the large mammal fossils described in older literature could not be recovered and were not counted
"three hominin phalanges" are mentioned in the text but not described and possibly not "in situ" but "derived from the overlying layer A"
micromammals, reptiles, and birds were described in older literature
some of the large mammal fossils described in older literature could not be recovered and were not counted
Metadata
Sample number: 4404
Contributor: John Alroy
Enterer: John Alroy
Created: 2023-12-10 16:19:19
Modified: 2023-12-10 05:19:19
Abundance distribution
15 species
7 singletons
total count 58
geometric series index: 40.8
Fisher's α: 6.560
geometric series k: 0.8046
Hurlbert's PIE: 0.8070
Shannon's H: 2.0919
Good's u: 0.8817
Each square represents a species. Square sizes are proportional to counts.
• Find matching samples
Register
†Stephanorhinus hemitoechus | 1 | |
†Equus cf. mauritanicus | 1 | |
Equus aff. africanus | 1 | 287 kg |
additionally, two metapodials were mentioned by Vaufrey (1941) but were not located | ||
†Equus hydruntinus | 1 | |
plus 1 Equus sp. | ||
†Bos primigenius | 2 | |
plus 1 Bovini | ||
Capra ibex | 21 | 37 kg |
Gazella cf. gazella | 7 | 21 kg |
Cervus elaphus | 2 | 104 kg |
Dama dama mesopotamica | 5 | 62 kg |
compared to this subspecies: plus 2 Cervidae | ||
Procavia sp. | 10 | |
Lepus capensis | 2 | |
Ochotona cf. rufescens | 2 | |
†Crocuta spelaea | 1 | |
"Crocuta crocuta spelaea" | ||
†Canis cf. mosbachensis | 1 | |
Vulpes vulpes | 1 | 5.3 kg carnivore-insectivore |